The Eucharist (Pt 1): Roman Catholic Magic

Recently Chloroform tried to sell the RC version of the Eucharist here,
in post #18 of another thread.

Quote: Originally Posted by God's Truth Catholics believe that the priest can turn wafers into Jesus’ real body...the priest turns the wafers into Jesus’ body. Nope. Rather, it is God who changes the eucharistic elements in response to the prayers of the priest. Big difference there. For what Catholics actually believe and teach concerning the Eucharist (Lord's Supper), see this. Gaudium de veritate, Cruciform +T+

I've decided to examine in detail the claimed Roman Catholic view,
and show exactly why it is both a nonsensical fantasy of magical thinking,
and a complete failure as an attempt to explain irrational behaviour
or convert anyone to Roman Catholicism on this particular doctrinal issue.

The first thing we will presume, quite fairly I think,
is that Fluffoform's website does indeed substantially and thoroughly
represent the Roman Catholic view, being based on RC sources,
and granting that Roman Catholics have had nearly 1400 years to
fine-tune and complete their articulation and defence of their
peculiarly nuanced view.

I will ask idiots and other Roman Catholics to refrain from replying here,
until I have posted the basic outline of failure to assist RCs in discovering
why their religious nonsense is both a lie, and utterly unconvincing to
people with an IQ over 80.

First off, we turn to the Catholic Webpage, and find there an outline of their 

explanation/defense:

THE EUCHARIST

Scripture

1. Old Testament
   1. Foreshadowing of the Eucharistic Sacrifice
   2. Foreshadowing of the Requirement to Consume the Sacrifice
       
2. New Testament
   1. Jesus Promises His Real Presence in the Eucharist
   2. Jesus Institutes the Eucharist / More Proofs of the Real Presence
   3. Jesus' Passion is Connected to the Passover Sacrifice Where the Lamb Must be Eaten
   4. Eucharist Makes Present Jesus' One Eternal Sacrifice; Not Just a Symbolic Memorial
   5. Jesus in Glory Perpetually Offers the Father His Sacrifice on our Behalf
   6. The Book of Revelation and the Holy Mass

Tradition / Church Fathers

1. Jesus’ Real Presence in the Eucharist
2. The Bread and Wine Become Jesus’ Body and Blood

Apparently, in an attempt to appeal to nominal Protestants,
the RC page first tries to lay out an argument/analogy/framework
using Holy Scripture as the basis.

Then it adds a section excerpting early Christian (RC) writers
who are imagined to have some authority, at least for representing
what presumably Roman Catholics believed or what authorities taught
about the Eucharist at various times.

This last section is at best secondary and incidental to the main point,
since if apologists can't explain the Eucharist using Holy Scripture,
then it matters not what or how many semi-literate clowns from the Middle Ages
thought this or that about it.

At least the authors of the webpage do seem to have an inkling that
only Holy Scripture will have any weight with Protestants when defending
or selling the Roman Catholic Eucharist.

This is more than Crucifuzz seems to grasp in regard to this problem
of credibility and success in teaching and convincing both opponents and
third parties unfamiliar with the discussion at hand.

Why would technical aspects of this ritual be of any importance whatever?


(1) Transusbstantiation

The first claim is that there is a real change of the bread and wine in the ritual
so that it becomes the flesh and blood of Jesus the Christ.



It is not the transubstantiation per se that really matters to the RC authorities.

It really doesn't make any difference whether God magically changes
bread and wine into flesh and blood, manna, or delicious Lucky Charms.


(2) A Special Elite Priestly Class

The point for the Roman Catholic Denomination is that God only does this
when bona fide "priests" of their religion pray and perform the ritual.

And secondly, the participation in this "meal", which can be WITHHELD
from non-Christians, church-members in bad standing, is supposed to be
a necessary or mandatory 'sacrament', which is something between
a privilege and a religious duty to perform (i.e., participate in while alive).

In some sense, Roman Catholics claim it is a necessary component of
forgiveness and salvation, and a sign of belonging to the 'saved' or
'true church'.

And since this 'meal' is regulated and controlled by the elite 'priesthood'
of duly ordained Roman Catholic priests, they claim to have in their power,
through this ritual control over who is and who isn't, a bona fide saved
Christian in good standing in a visible Earthly Church defined and identified
as themselves (i.e., the Roman Catholic denomination).


So to sum up, Roman Catholic priests claim to be an elite class of Christians,
distinguished in part by their authority and power to perform a "mass",
which is a ritual meal, which in answer to their unique prayers,
is changed from ordinary bread and wine,
into the flesh and blood of Jesus the Christ.


(3) Participation Mandatory for Good Standing

And they would further claim that to be a bona fide Christian,
one must participate in this mysterious spiritual cannibalism,
and do it only under the supervision of this elite class of power brokers
called priests.



(4) No Physical Change Required

It must be further observed that the Roman Catholic priests do not claim
that there will be any 'visible' or verifiable sign of this 'spiritual change',
and acknowledge that the bread and wine in the ceremony look, act and
taste exactly the same as the bread and wine they certainly were, before the ritual.

Thus there is no visible or scientifically measurable change in the bread and wine.

We are to believe some invisible mysterious change, magically occurs,
during the 'mass' in response to the prayers of the priest,
which is nontheless "real" and "literal" in some substantial sense,
only without any detectable effect.

The effect claimed, is entirely spiritual, and without any necessary physical evidence,
and so at once we cannot talk of a physical claim in the chemical or Newtonian sense.



(5) Sacrifice

Another aspect of this claim is one of status and apparent substance,
in that Roman Catholic priests say they are priests performing a sacrifice:

That is, Jesus' flesh and blood is in some sense 'alive' during the ritual,
and is 'sacrificed' as some kind of atonement for sin during the ritual.

It is not a mere memorial, nor a re-enactment or a nmemonic aid to worship.

Somehow Jesus again, and repeatedly pours out his 'self-sacrifice' in this ritual.
Again, it is not a mere re-enactment for Jesus either, but a 'new miracle',
a mystery in which people are concurrently forgiven and blessed,
and somehow in the present actively participate in a 'cloning' or 'action'
which took place 2000 years ago, but is again acting in the here and now,
through this 'mystery ritual' or 'sacrificial meal'.

The Seven Trumpets: Literal Interpretations gaining Plausibility

Given the rapid changes in the world stage and recent events,
it has become clear that more literal interpretations of Revelation
have become much more plausible and credible than in the more recent past.

Many Christian groups, both Protestant and Catholic are struggling to
find authentic and appropriate interpretations and applications of the many
scenarios found in the Book of Revelation.

The Seven Trumpets are one group of such prophetic scenes,
which now more than any other time in history offer themselves
as literal and immediate future events.

Lets have a look at some of the Trumpet Prophecies:

For convenience we here take a few screenshots of a recent Youtube on this:


TRUMPET 1:  Lightning and Red Hail:

Well the first trumpet offers a simple and straightforward literal interpretation.
Lightning is a phenomenon most people are familiar with.   The "red hail" is a little more obscure, but could be a combination of small meteorite showers or
some secondary phenomenon caused by the first.

It should be remembered that ordinary lightning is a local phenomenon, but reasonably understood as electrical discharging or exchange of high volumes of electric current across the sky and between the atmosphere and ground.

Global Electrical Storms

To occur on a global scale, we would expect some scientific cause such as
an over-charging of the magnetosphere and/or atmosphere as a result of
a radical change in either the Solar Wind or our own magnetic poles,
which are responsible for the support of the Magnetosphere.

The Magnetosphere normally protects the earth from both the Sun's radiation
(Solar Wind) and also the bulk of cosmic radiation.   If our magnetic poles,
and also our Magnetosphere were to collapse or be drastically altered,
a scenario where vast amounts of electical energy are released from the sky
onto the earth is quite plausible.

The Northern Lights are an already well known cause of smaller imbalances
in our Magnetosphere and the resultant coronal discharges of ions and energy.

If vast amounts of electro-magnetic energy are released, any number of
other secondary atmospheric effects could be possible, accounting for
things like 'red hail' etc.

TRUMPET 2:  Lightning and Red Hail:


Trumpet 2 is more interesting, and we now have much more geophysical
background knowledge to explain events like this.

Small volcanoes are plentiful around the globe, especially along
tectonic plate fault-lines and areas of 'plate subduction',
but are also found as 'punch-throughs' in the middle of large unbroken
plate pieces, and they can happen anywhere.

Likewise, there are ancient legends already,
such as Atlantis , in which whole cities (mountains) and/or even islands
have vanished under the sea, probably accompanied by volcanic action.

Yet, as far as 'recent' earth history is concerned, (i.e., the last 5,000 years),
no chunk of land large enough to kill 1/3 of the oceans has ever slid into the sea.

That is not to say however, that we haven't had local mini-versions of
this phenomenon, such as Krakatoa (1883) and more recently Mt. St. Helens (1983).


Krakatoa:  Mountain falls into sea, 1883

Lets look at Krakatoa.  It is doubly significant, because it is not only
a very close case to a mountain collapsing into the sea, but its date is also
unusual, as well as the sheer size of this catastrophe:

'The 1883 eruption of Krakatoa in the Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia) began on August 26, 1883 (with origins as early as May of that year) and culminated with several destructive eruptions of the remaining caldera. On August 27, two thirds of Krakatoa collapsed in a chain of titanic explosions, destroying most of the island and its surrounding archipelago. Additional alleged seismic activity continued to be reported until February 1884, though reports of those after October 1883 were later dismissed by Rogier Verbeek's investigation. It was one of the deadliest and most destructive volcanic events in recorded history, with at least 36,417 deaths being attributed to the eruption itself and the tsunamis it created. Significant additional effects were also felt around the world.'

 (The date is also significant, as it was just after the release-date of the mutilated "Revised Version" of the New Testament, which attempted to delete some 200 whole and half-verses from the Bible, and thankfully was rejected by Christians throughout the British Commonwealth, in favour of the traditional King James Version.)

 We are also 'lucky' in the sense that the recent invention of photography allowed for the capture of some of this incredible historical eruption on film.

What Krakatoa shows, is that indeed, mountains and islands CAN collapse
and fall into the sea.

Our next question of course, is where might this horrific prophecy take place,
in order to destroy 1/3 of life in the seas?

Two very obvious and plausible places are Japan, and California/Yellowstone.

Japan is placed right on the "Rim of Fire" and is historically suffered from
many earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis over a long period.

California is on a known massive fault-line, and right next to the
infamous Yellowstone Cauldera, which is believed to be due for an eruption.
The size of the eruption of Yellowstone is estimated to be 1000 times as large
as that of Mount St. Helens.

If this region were to blow, we might expect large portions of California coast
to slide into the Sea.

The major collapse of these regions on either side of the Pacific,
or even both of them together, could conceivably kill 1/3 of life in the ocean.

TWO BEASTS in Revelation 13 - A Solution to Controversy

Protestants in the West have historically been Eurocentric in interpreting the Book of Revelation.

The Roman Catholics have favored a 'preterist interpretation' which is essentially either historic (fulfilled in the past) or allegorical (spiritual meanings).

The Protestants have tended to stick to literal interpretations, but have focussed on the Vatican or Roman Catholicism as the Anti-Christ.   For the last hundred years or so, the Middle East itself was either forgotten, downplayed or separated out as historical prophecy for the pre-Christian era.

Relatively recently however, Western Protestant Christians have had to recognize the literal fulfillment of some astounding prophecies, such as the re-establishment of a modern State of Israel, and the revival of radical Islam.

The solution to the new dilemma may be found in the previously unnoticed mention of TWO beasts in Revelation chapter 13.

Here we can present two recent but complimentary attempts at interpretation of the Revelation, one which focusses on the Vatican System, and the other which focusses on Islam and the Middle East:

First the Protestant take on the Vatican:

Now a Middle-Eastern view of the End Times:

How Ontario was taken over by Homosexuals (pt 3)

Americans should be warned that Canada appears to be a "test market"
for LGBT lobby groups to experiment on the public.
The Canadian public is a poorly educated non-armed public,
with low risk in terms of fallout.

So LGBT activists practise their plans and perfect their methodology and strategy,
then move things to the USA.

Its not a coincidence that it happens first in Canada, then in the USA.

Those who care should pay close attention to Canada, and help us defend ourselves
from these jerks.

It should be mentioned that the homo lawyer group made another two-pronged atttack
on the Canadian Criminal Code and our legal system,


(1) Attacking the Marriage Laws including sodomy against a spouse.

(2) Expanding the Marriage Law to include same-sex couples. A complete farce.

(3) Attacking the "bawdy house" Law from another angle, namely redefining and legalizing prostitution.

i) Prostitution was made legal, while "living off the avails of prostitution" was made illegal,
the claim being made that this would protect women by preventing pimps from making money off them.
This never happened in real life, because the laws were unenforcable.
Instead, prostitution and "escort services", "massage parlors" etc. went through the roof,
and such became the major industry in Toronto.
The same pimps continued to make money under the umbrella of organized crime,
and escort services, bars etc. started paying "protection money" to the police.

ii) The charging of "johns" (clients of prostitutes) was abandoned as unenforceable while prostitutes walked free.

iii) The "bawdy house" law became practically unenforceable, because prostitutes couldn't be charged,
and pimps couldn't be identified.

(4) The real truth about the exploitation of women was completely suppressed by the liberal media.

i) The largest clients for prostitution were in fact middle classes and civil servants with disposable income.

ii) Organized crime continued to control the prostitution industry.

iii) Organized crime infiltrated the government by blackmailing lawyers and politicians who used their services.

iv) Organized Crime expanded into the lucrative child - trafficking business,
by creating independent corporations pretending to offer "Child Protection services" (CPS / CAS)
which were then funded by government without any supervision or accountability.
These organizations were given draconian superpowers to invade homes of poor people and Native people,
and take their children on hearsay evidence, suspicion and contrived evidence.
The children were then given to rich people in pedophile clubs to sexually abuse and murder.

As a result, thousands of children in Canada were kidnapped using the police as muscle,
and distributed to wealthy pedophiles. These children were sexually and physically abused,
and often murdered or forced into prostitution in major cities like Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto and Montreal, and Ottawa.

The major clients for underage prostitutes were politicians, and government officials
who used government credit cards to pay organized crime to supply the exploited teens and children.

Thank God, the God of the Bible, Creator of Heavens and Earth
that this fight isn't over yet:

Ontario Tory leader questions premier over accused child porn maker’s role in radical sex-ed program TORONTO, July 10, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Ontario’s opposition leader has called on Premier Kathleen Wynne to break her silence on the child porn charges filed this week against her advisor and former staffer. Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak has joined a growing chorus of parents, pundits, and civil leaders calling on the Premier to come clean on the role played by former Ontario deputy education minister Benjamin Levin in developing a radical sex ed curriculum for the province. Hudak's comments come as Levin was charged with two more child porn offences in court Wednesday morning, for possessing child pornography and accessing child pornography, after the police raided his home Monday. “Nothing makes your - as a dad, as a mom, as a human being - your heart freeze like hearing about somebody who's been charged with, not only having child pornography, but actually in the production of such,” Hudak told reporters, as reported by the Sun News Network. “I don't think there's a more heinous crime that we could actually think of in terms of our families.” “What does that mean with respect to the curriculum?” he said. “Well, first of all, I think it's very important for Kathleen Wynne to tell us exactly that the government is cooperating fully with any police investigations on this very serious crime.” In his role as Ontario’s deputy minister of education, Levin was the Ministry’s top public servant. He served from 2004 to 2009, during the time the Ministry was developing its much-criticized “equity and inclusive education” strategy and a sex-ed curriculum that was shelved by then-Premier Dalton McGuinty in 2010 because it was so controversial. The sex-ed program, which was to begin with 6-year-olds in grade 1, introduced concepts such as “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” by grade 3, masturbation by grade 6, and anal and oral sex by grade 7. Levin highlighted his role in developing the “equity and inclusive education” strategy in a letter dated April 6, 2009. The strategy sparked intense controversy because of its promotion of homosexual activism in the schools. It also helped shape the development of the sex-ed program. In the letter, sent to the province’s directors of education and principals, he says: "This province-wide strategy has been a priority for our Minister of Education Kathleen Wynne and me." Levin, 61, was arrested early Monday morning by Toronto Police after an online, multi-jurisdictional investigation involving officials from New Zealand and London, Ontario. He was charged with one count of making child pornography, two counts of distributing child pornography, and one count each of counselling to commit an indictable offence and agreeing or arranging a sexual offence against a child under 16. Levin was highly respected in the education community, and served under Wynne between 2006 and 2009 when she was Ontario’s Minister of Education. When she became premier after winning the Liberal leadership race, making her the first lesbian head of government in the country, Wynne named Levin as a member of her transition team. Since leaving the Ministry of Education, Levin has acted as Canada Research Chair in Education Leadership and Policy for the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto. He has also served as an education consultant to the Ontario government, including as an expert on “equity.” Premier Wynne’s office, the Ministry of Education, and the University of Toronto have so far declined to comment on the charges. Contact info: Tim Hudak, Ontario PC Leader Phone: 416-861-0020 Toll-free: 1-800-903-6453

How Ontario was taken over by Homosexuals (pt 2)

The huge amount of work foisting the Gay Agenda upon Ontario children
did not however prevent Premier Wynne from appointing her brother-in-law
through a phoney homosexual 'marriage' to the top job in EHealth Ontario:

Kathleen Wynne’s brother-in-law named interim head of eHealth Ontario Apr 15 2014 Premier Kathleen Wynne’s brother-in-law has been named the interim chief executive of eHealth Ontario, a move that raised the hackles of New Democrats at Queen’s Park with a spring election possible. David Rounthwaite — who has been eHealth’s general counsel for four years — was given the role in a unanimous vote of the agency’s board of directors after interim CEO Ray Hession stepped aside to take care of his ill wife, eHealth spokesman Rob Mitchell said Tuesday. “He was here long before Kathleen Wynne announced her intentions to run for premier,” Mitchell said of the appointment, which was effective March 7 but not widely publicized or posted on the website of the electronic health records agency. Rounthwaite, an experienced Bay Street lawyer, is the brother of Wynne’s spouse, Jane Rounthwaite. David Rounthwaite will remain at his general counsel salary of $210,000 a year while he acts as interim CEO for eHealth. NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said the appointment brings more attention to eHealth and its troubled past, which includes a spending scandal that saw consultants paid up to $3,000 a day expensing tea and cookies to taxpayers. “My concern is that the appearance of something inappropriate is not a positive thing.” Wynne’s minority Liberal administration, under daily attack for deleted emails in the $1.1 billion scandal over cancelled gas plants, is about to bring in a budget requiring NDP support to avoid a spring election. Rounthwaite is taking the eHealth job while an executive search firm continues looking for a full-time CEO to replace former head Greg Reed, whose departure last June caused a stir because of his $406,250 severance package stemming from a contract approved by former premier Dalton McGuinty’s cabinet in 2010. Although Reed earned $325,000 a year, Rounthwaite is staying at his salary of $210,000, said Health Minister Deb Matthews, who told reporters she has known about the appointment for six weeks.

The details of the actual shockingly explicit and unscientific content
of the new Sex Ed Public School Curriculum can be seen in the literature
which has already been handed out experimentally all over Ontario,
WITHOUT permission or knowledge of parents,
by independent Lesbian Radical Feminists and the LBGT 'community',
knowing that they won't be prosecuted because
Kathleen Wynne is going to make it law soon:

Previous Article on Lesbian Alliance's attack on Children


Caution: sexually suggestive and inappropriate content of "educational" pamphlets for evidence. 

No story of how Ontario fell into the hands of homosexuals would be complete
without a quick recounting of the beginnings, circa 1981 to be accurate:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Soap Canada's "bawdy-house" law, under which the charges in this raid were laid, has never been repealed, but has only rarely been applied against gay establishments since the trials connected to the 1981 raids ended.[1]

The pro-homo version of events can be found here:

http://dailyxtra.com/canada/news/the...se-riots-51955 Gay people were not new to discrimination in 1975 when Montreal police raided that city’s Sauna Aquarius. But that is really where the story of the 1981 bathhouse riots starts. For at least the next six years, police in various cities across the country steadily increased their harassment of the gay press and gay men in gay spaces. Gay people had, of course, previously fought police harassment, but the events in Toronto in the first half of 1981 were watershed for the liberation movement in Canada. The activist chops refined then equipped gay people across the country to fight censorship, win partnership and employment rights, demand reasonable treatment from government, face HIV/AIDS, fight homophobic violence and win marriage rights. If gay people had run for the shadows in 1981, if the found-ins had pleaded guilty, if those who marched on that first cold February night had simply stayed home, Canada would be a very different place for gay people today.

Of course that version of events leaves out some very serious aspects.

(1) There was no "lesbian community" in 1981, and whatever 'gay community'
there was, was a criminal group of perverts hiding from the law.

(2) In the 1980s, it was easy to recruit thousands of disgruntled teens
for the homosexual cause, because they had already been preconditioned
to reject normal moral and ethical values, and mainstream religion,
in favour of "free love" (read: free sex for hyperactive teen boys, stimulated
by Hugh Hefner's Playboy magazine and Penthouse).

(3) 99% of the homosexuals (and police targets) were men engaging in
sodomy and luring underage boys to participate in perverse S&M orgies.

(4) The mainstream narrative implies the laws were never changed.
This is blatantly false. What happened was that the police made the
tactical mistake of raiding "The Barracks", an S&M homosexual club
frequented by Toronto lawyers. The lawyers retaliated by going to war
against the police and the Criminal Code of Canada, and managed to
have the Sodomy Laws struck down, the Obscenity Laws struck down,
and the Indecency Laws struck down, in order to completely destroy
the power of the police to enforce the Criminal Code as it stood.

(5) At the same time, the homosexual lawyers also made two more
changes, forcing same-sex marriage on an unwilling Canadian public,
and also drastically rewriting the "Rape" Law, with one very subtle but
clever change: They substituted "sexual assault" for "rape", without
changing any other part of the Rape law. This suddenly made
thousands of other acts criminally illegal, and at the same time,
imposed the same penalties for those crimes as formerly only applied to
actual rape.

(6) Thus, now the lawyers and extremists, feminist radicals,
and simple criminals could entrap, frame and have arrested and imprisoned
any heterosexual male who dared to act in 'inappropriate' fashion,
and also get convictions for the most outrageous false-accusations
based only on the testimony of a woman or child, coached to
make the accusation.

This was used extensively to destroy mens' lives,
allow disgruntled ex-wives to secure money and vindictively punish
former husbands, taking away rights to access of children etc.




A quick synopsis can be found here:

Toronto Bathhouse Raids On February 5, 1981, 286 men were arrested in a series of raids on Toronto area bathhouses, the largest mass arrest since the October Crisis, sparking outrage in the Gay and Lesbian community. The Raids At approximately 11 p.m. on the night of February 5, Police raided four bathhouses: Club Baths, Romans II Health and Recreation Spa, Richmond Street Health Emporium and the Barracks. The owners were charged with 'keeping a common bawdy-house', and 286 occupants were arrested. Aftermath On the night following the raids, several thousand protestors took to downtown streets, blockading a number of intersections. Over the next month, several other demonstrations took place, which culminated in a 'Gay Freedom Rally'' on March 6. This included the involvement of Rev. Brent Hawkes (who had gone on a hunger strike), MP Svend Robinson and noted author Margaret Atwood. Hawkes ended his hunger strike with a promise from the City to launch an investigation into the raids. The Richmond Street Health Emporium never opened again. Legacy The rally of March 6 was effectively the first street incarnation of what has become known as Toronto Pride Week, Pride week is one of the largest Gay Pride events in the world, with over one million participants annually. Womens Bathhouse Raids On September 14, 2000, an Womens bathhouse event, the ***** Palace, was crashed by an all-male squad of the Toronto Police. No arrests or charges were laid at the time, although the Police recorded the names of ten women (mostly organizers of the event) and spent one hour roaming around watching the 300 attendees. The officers were never disciplined.

As can be observed above,
that after thousands of cops resigned or took early retirement
in the face of this and the new Abortion Now Legal changes,
the cops who were left were a shallow bunch of opportunist perverts
who simply used what was left of existing law to
act as voyeurs to observe lesbians engaging in sex.

Shortly after 2000, homosexual men and women
enlisted into the police forces across Canada,
with the result that the police became predominantly homosexual or
bi-sexual, and homo tolerant (it is impossible to get employment
now in any government position without being pro-gay and supporting
gay causes, including 'same sex marriage', 'gay adoption', 'gay education',
and government funded 'pro gay programs' and special benefits for gays.)

How Ontario was Taken Over by Homosexuals (Pt. 1)

The Horror Story of Kathleen Wynn Begins:

Ontario to introduce more explicit sex education in schools Apr. 20 2010, The days of euphemisms and innuendo in Ontario's classrooms are numbered, with the province set to roll out a new sex education curriculum next fall built on clear and explicit language that has raised objections from conservative parent groups. The revision, outlined in 208 pages that were quietly posted on the Ministry of Education's website in January, will for the first time teach Grade 3 pupils about such topics as sexual identity and orientation, and introduce terms like "anal intercourse" and "vaginal lubrication" to children in Grades 6 and 7. The new curriculum begins in Grade 1 with lessons about the proper names of body parts. The changes came to light Tuesday, when members of a religious, "family-focused" coalition threatened to pull their children out of school on May 10 unless Premier Dalton McGuinty abandons the changes. The Premier stood by the curriculum, saying he has confidence in the judgment of school principals and teachers to present the information in a thoughtful and responsible manner. If sex education is not taught in the classroom, he added, students could get information from potentially uninformed sources, such as their friends. "If we can provide it in a format and in a venue over which we have some control ... why wouldn't we recognize that we live in an information age and why wouldn't we try to present this information in a thoughtful and responsible and open way," Mr. McGuinty said. Critics said topics such as homosexuality are best left to parents to discuss with their children. "I think it's a sort of infringement on parents, because you're talking about a very personal and sensitive area and dealing with kids so young I believe what it will end up infringing on their thought processes and their desires and ability to make correct choices," said Reverend Ekron Malcolm, director of the Institute for Canadian Values, who is involved in the coalition. Some of the most controversial changes are in the Grade 3 curriculum. In a discussion on human development and showing respect for people's differences, for example, teachers are invited to discuss "invisible differences," including gender identity and sexual orientation, in an effort to reflect the fact that more and more students have same-sex parents. Christian right leader Charles McVety, who is also part of the coalition, said it is unconscionable to teach children as young as eight years old gender identity and sexual orientation. He accused the Premier of listening to "special interest groups with an agenda," including former education minister Kathleen Wynne, who is openly gay. The curriculum hadn't been reviewed since 1998, and the changes reflect Ontario's diverse society and have nothing to do with Ms. Wynne, who is now Transportation Minister, said Michelle Despault, a spokeswoman for Education Minister Lorna Dombrowsky. "As a government, we have a commitment to provide a curriculum that is both equitable and inclusive," she said.

After parents reeled in horror, and protests spread,
Canadians were lulled into thinking they had stopped the madness:

Sex ed opponents claim victory in Ontario Apr 23, 2010 The decision by Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty to back away from a controversial new sex education curriculum for the province's schools has been greeted with relief by some interest groups and concern by others. "It's become pretty obvious to us that we should give this a serious rethink," McGuinty told reporters Thursday. "We by no means are gloating," said Rev. Ekron Malcolm, director of the Institute for Canadian Values, "but we give God the glory. It's a victory for the Canadian children." The new sex education curriculum that had been planned for Ontario grade schools will not be introduced when the 2010-11 school year begins, McGuinty announced. Religious groups objected to the revised curriculum and raised a voluble campaign against it earlier this week. They promised a huge demonstration on the front lawn of Queen's Park to protest the sex education changes. "It is unconscionable to teach eight-year-old children same-sex marriage, sexual orientation and gender identity," said Charles McVety, head of the Canada Christian College. "It is even more absurd to subject sixth graders to instruction on the pleasures of masturbation, vaginal lubrication, and 12-year-olds to lessons on oral sex and anal intercourse." Sudden turnabout McGuinty appeared to be caught by surprise by the new curriculum, and just scant hours after his education minister defended it in the provincial legislature, he told reporters the sex ed program was halted. "The fact of the matter is that we have a very diverse province. And I think that it's very important that as a government when we develop policies of any kind — but especially when it comes to sex education in our schools, something that touches our children directly — that we listen very carefully to what parents have to say and we take their concerns into account and lend shape to a curriculum that they are comfortable with," the premier said. Wilfrid Laurier University Prof. David Docherty said the explicit language in the curriculum may have caught McGuinty off guard. "The language has changed [from previous sex education material] and I suspect it is the language that has angered, or concerned some parents — and has allowed others who are opposed to broader sex education in school in general, to jump on this and suggest the government is going far, too far."

The Liberal Government put this perversion on the backburner,
as a more important crisis, and opportunities for fraud and scandal arose:

Ontario's McGuinty re-elected, but loses majority Voter turnout reaches a new low By Andrew Lupton , CBC News Posted: Oct 06, 2011 After being "counted out and written off" Dalton McGuinty's Liberals managed to secure a third straight mandate on Thursday, but fell just shy of a third straight majority. With all the votes counted, the Liberals had won 53 ridings, one short of the 54 needed for a majority. With all polls reporting, the Liberals had captured 37.6 per cent of the popular vote, with the Progressive Conservatives close behind at 35.4 per cent. NDP support was at 22.7 per cent, with the Greens at 2.9 per cent, down just over five percentage points from their showing in the 2007 election. The PC and NDP gains came entirely at the expense of the Liberals, the only party not to pick up seats from the other two parties. The Progressive Conservative Party under Tim Hudak was poised to add 12 seats to the 25 they held when parliament dissolved while the NDP added seven seats to the 10 they held heading into the election. Leaders of all three major parties were re-elected in their ridings: McGuinty (Ottawa South), Hudak (Niagara-West Glanbrook) and the NDP's Andrea Horwath (Hamilton Centre). In his victory speech at the Chateau Laurier hotel in Ottawa, McGuinty said the result will allow Ontario to move forward with "an experienced Liberal government." "It's time to move forward the Ontario way, it's about building and working together," he said. "Liberalism [homosexuality] in this great country is alive and well and living in Ontario."

Thus Ontario nearly voted McGuinty and the Liberals out of office,
but pathetic voter turn out allowed him to hang in with a minority government,
because the civil servants Union and the Teachers Union supported him.

Dalton McGuinty tells Catholic church he’s in charge of schools The provincial government — not the Catholic church — is the higher power when it comes to running Ontario schools, says Premier Dalton McGuinty. Tue May 29 2012 The provincial government — not the Catholic church — is the higher power when it comes to running Ontario schools, says Premier Dalton McGuinty. The reminder came a day after Cardinal Thomas Collins, archbishop of Toronto, accused the minority Liberal government of making “religious freedom . . . a second-class right” with a controversial amendment to an anti-bullying bill. McGuinty, a Catholic whose wife Terri teaches in the separate school system that gets $7 billion annually in taxpayer funding, acknowledged Collins has responsibilities to exercise in his position. “I have a different set of responsibilities,” McGuinty said Tuesday at the Bombardier factory in Downsview. “I’m accountable to all faiths, I’m accountable to people of no faith. I’m accountable to all parents.” Under the amendment supported by the New Democrats and the Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association, Catholic schools must let students call anti-homophobia support groups “gay” clubs or words to that effect if teens so desire. That means all children “will be accepted and respected for who they are,” the premier said, arguing it is one of Ontario’s “fundamental values that transcend any one faith.” Collins questioned why the government would be “rigid” in giving students more power than school principals and trustees in naming clubs. “Any student apparently can sort of override the people who have a serious responsibility to care for all the kids in the school,” Collins, also president of the Assembly of Catholic Bishops of Ontario, told Newstalk 1010. Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak, who attended Catholic school and whose father was a principal, agreed with Collins that school officials should get the final word. “I really don’t care what people decide in schools to call clubs. I just think that principals should have a say in what’s happening in those schools.” Hudak said “oh, sure” when asked if it was possible to have an anti-homophobia club in a school without using the word “gay” or similar terminology in the name. “This is supposed to be about fighting bullying across the board, protecting kids no matter why they’re bullied — if they’re gay, if they’re disabled, if they’re fat or whatever reason.” ... Liberal sources say they amended the language in the bill to “remove any ambiguity” that might allow Catholic educators to override the provincial edict on naming clubs. They believe the strategy has been successful politically because the NDP hasn’t broached it in the legislature and, more surprisingly, neither have the Tories despite their concerns. That has led to an easy ride for the government — at least at Queen’s Park — on a contentious issue that has dominated news headlines and talk radio all week. The cardinal’s statement against the amendment — including his plea that “we simply ask that diversity be respected in our society” — has Liberals suggesting his comments make the government seem reasonable and fair. Although Conservatives have charged the amendment is a deliberate provocation of Catholics aimed at sapping public support for their school funding, Broten reiterated that is “absolutely not” the case. Collins acknowledged the threat of lost funding is often made at Catholics. “I’m a taxpayer too but we all are serving the common good, so this idea you can kind of override the religious values that serve the common good just simply on the point of public funding I think is just not a good argument.” Jim Hughes of the anti-abortion group Campaign Life Coalition charged that Broten’s amendment on gay naming shows she is “an apologist for the homosexual activists and their drive to insert their agenda into all schools.”

But it wasn't just about letting students in Catholic highschools
have "gay clubs".

McGuinty and his band of homos still wanted to teach public school kids
all about the joys of masturbation and anal sex, as early as 3rd grade.


In a dirty scam, the Liberals inserted Wynn into the job of Premier of Ontario,
without any chance for voters to have a say on the matter.

McGuinty simply resigned as premier, and let the Liberal Party
vote her in as the new leader, with the result that she automatically
took over the job of Premier in a manner similar to vice-presidents
stepping into office if somehow presidents are ousted.

Updated: 02/12/2013 Kathleen Wynne In January 2013 Kathleen Wynne won the Ontario Liberal Party leadership race to replace Dalton McGuinty who had announced his retirement after nine years in the province's top political job. She becomes the province's first woman premier [without being elected] and also the first openly gay premier.

Once in power, Wynne quickly coordinated the destruction of all evidence
that would incriminate McGuinty and the Liberal party of the biggest fraud
in Ontario history:

KATHLEEN WYNNE’S LIBERALS MISLED PUBLIC ON $1.1 BILLION SCANDAL Publication: OP-ED Oakville Gas Plant Cost MPP Julia Munro, York-Simcoe | Date: Nov 15 2013 Yesterday, Ontario’s Auditor General revealed the true cost of the Liberal government’s cancellation of the Oakville gas-fired power plant: $1.1 Billion. That’s right, $1,100,000,000.00, and it’s paid by your taxes and your electricity bill. It amounts to $150.00 from each Ontarian who is old enough to work, just to pay for this massive boondoggle. The Liberals went to extraordinary lengths to hide this number from the people of Ontario. So while Kathleen Wynne assures us that everything has changed under her leadership, we have ample evidence to the contrary. Liberals remain under investigation by the OPP for their role in hiding the depth of the gas plant scandals. Rightfully so, questions of accountability continue to plague the government. Does this sound familiar? That’s because these scandals and cover-ups are straight from the Dalton McGuinty playbook. Kathleen Wynne co-chaired the campaign that decided to cancel the plants. She signed the document cancelling the Oakville gas plant, but refused to come clean on the cost. While this province suffers under high unemployment, the Liberals continue to put their priorities ahead of the people of this province. When they should be focused on jobs and growth, they have been focused on saving their political skin. The people of York-Simcoe are fed up with watching taxpayer dollars treated as Liberal Party donations. ... The Oakville gas plan cost the people of this province over $1.1 Billion. That’s $1.1 Billion we could have used to improve healthcare. Or $1.1 Billion that could have gone towards ensuring a top-class education system for our children. That $1.1 Billion could have put people back to work, by funding public infrastructure projects in our communities. Instead, it was used to pay for one Liberal seat, in Oakville. Is this the respect taxpayers deserve? Of course not. But over the past ten years, the Liberals have proven that they will always put their party before hard-working families in this province. ..."

Next, Wynne set about ensuring she and the Liberal Party could
hang onto governmental power, by bribing the Teachers Union
with the biggest payoff in Ontario history:

Wynne cost taxpayers $468M by renegotiating teachers’ contracts ahead of last Ontario election, November 19, 2014 Premier Kathleen Wynne’s decision to reopen contracts for public school teachers last year cost Ontario taxpayers $468 million, auditor general Bonnie Lysyk reported Wednesday. The Liberals hoped to save $2.4 billion when they passed legislation in Sept. 2012 to freeze teachers’ pay for two years and reduce banked sick days and pension benefits, but the auditor found they gave some of the savings back to the unions. “The savings were reduced as a result of subsequent discussions,” said Lysyk. Of the total cost, $200 million went toward giving teachers and school board workers more paid sick days, hiring more substitute teachers to cover the sick days and changing the eligibility threshold for retirement benefits, she said. It cost another $155 million to reduce the number of unpaid professional activity days, give teachers one day’s pay if they take fewer than six sick days a year, improve maternity benefits and compensate school boards for increased expenses because of the new deals. And it cost another $113 million to eliminate wage differences between teachers’ unions, which have so-called “me too” clauses so every group benefits when one negotiates a new or increased benefit, added Lysyk. “So if you add the $200 million, the $155 and the $113, that is the total for the additional costs,” she told reporters. Wynne was not available for comment on the auditor’s report

Where is Premier Wynne going to get $500 million dollars to pay off
the Teachers Union (the most powerful union in Ontario) for securing
her election?

Simple: By cutting the Education Budget by $500 million!

Ontario government planning $500M cut to education funding November 18, 2014 TORONTO -- Some schools in Ontario will be shut down as the Liberal government makes education funding cuts to help eliminate a $12.5-billion deficit in three years, Education Minister Liz Sandals admitted Tuesday. The planned cuts are included in the government's 2015-16 education funding guide, which was obtained by the New Democrats and calls for permanent savings of up to $500 million by 2017-18.

Now that the books have been balanced by diverting money meant for
schools and books to Teachers Union payoffs,
and with her re-election secure for another five years,
Wynne and the homosexual faction are now pushing ahead
on the plan to teach children about anal sex again in grade 3.

There was a small snag however, in that the main architect of
the new school curriculum had already been caught with child porn
and charged as a pedophile:

More child porn charges laid against former deputy education minister Benjamin Levin, 61, of Toronto, faces five charges, including two counts of distributing child pornography and one count of making child pornography, during a court appearance in Toronto on Monday, July 8, 2013. (John Mantha / CTV News) Diana Mehta, The Canadian Press Published Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:31PM EDT Last Updated Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:36PM EDT TORONTO -- A University of Toronto professor who once held the post of deputy education minister in Ontario and Manitoba was slapped with two new charges Wednesday in an ongoing child pornography investigation. Benjamin Levin -- who was also on Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne's transition team as she took office earlier this year -- now faces a total of seven charges. The new charges were laid as the 61-year-old appeared in a Toronto court for a bail hearing Wednesday. After a full day of arguments, Levin was granted bail, with a long list of conditions.... "The Crown's position is that he should not have been released, he was released," lawyer Clayton Ruby said outside the courthouse. The latest charges against Levin are one count of possessing child pornography and one count of accessing child pornography. "It's a result of the evidence that was seized," Det. Const. Janelle Blackadar told The Canadian Press. "There was an initial forensics examination that was done on digital data." Levin was arrested on Monday and initially charged with two counts of distributing child pornography and one count each of making child pornography, counselling to commit an indictable offence and arrangement of a sexual offence against a child under 16. The charge against Levin which deals with the making of child pornography is in relation to alleged "written texts," said Blackadar. "Written texts so to speak that is a graphic depiction of a sexual encounter between an adult and children," she explained. "The graphic depiction of that is consistent with the criminal code definition of child pornography." The investigation which led to Levin's arrest began in the middle of last year. Officials in Toronto were then contacted by authorities in New Zealand and later police in London, Ont., Blackadar said. "We decided we would link our evidence together," she said. "We're still gathering some intelligence." The Ontario government has confirmed that Levin was a former adviser to the premier. "I was shocked to hear about these charges through the news on Monday. Insidious crimes like these are absolutely terrifying," Wynne said in a statement. "The safety and well-being of our children has always been my absolute priority and at no time did I have any suspicion of criminal behaviour. I am confident that the police and judicial system will address these serious allegations." Levin was also recently involved with the Ontario government through contract research projects and guest speaking roles in his capacity as a professor -- work that has been suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. From late 2004 to early 2007, Levin served under former Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty as deputy minister of education. He also served as Manitoba's deputy minister of advanced education and deputy minister of education, training and youth between 1999 and 2002. Most recently, he had been working as a professor and research chair in education and leadership at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto. Levin's position as an academic involved in international projects raised concerns for police.

However, the way court cases are conducted in Ontario is that
a publication ban will be automatically granted, and this case
will take about five or more years to wind its way through the courts.

It looks as though this was planned all along,
since it effectively prevents those opposing the Premier's plan
to change the school curriculum from using the media to
point to Levin as the pervert who created it.

"Fairness" requires that he be considered innocent until convicted,
and that his trial not be prejudiced by publication of details of charges,
and evidence.

This effectively means no one can accuse Levin of being a pedophile,
and protest against the new School Curriculum on this basis!.

So naturally the Lesbian pedophile Premier Wynne will simply go ahead,
and push the homosexual agenda down the throats of children and parents:

Sex ed in Ontario schools, the sequel November 06, 2014 Premier Kathleen Wynne will introduce a controversial sex education curriculum into Ontario elementary schools in September 2015. Controversial because the last time the Liberal government tried to do this in 2010 — when Wynne was education minister from 2006 to early 2010 — it botched it so badly then premier Dalton McGuinty killed it. McGuinty cancelled its implementation just hours after his own cabinet ministers had vigorously defended the new curriculum, which called for teacher-led discussions of topics such as masturbation, oral and anal sex and homosexuality by Grade 8. He said the province hadn’t consulted enough with parents, even though his own government insisted it had consulted with the public for two years. In fact, few parents had heard of the new curriculum until critics, led by Charles McVety, president of Canada Christian College, started campaigning against it. This time, Wynne’s government says it will have 4,000 hand-picked parents chosen by school principals participate in an online survey on the sex education curriculum before it is introduced. Most are expected to be the chairs of school councils. But their purpose, other than providing a rubber stamp of approval, seems unclear. That because while selected parents will be asked their views about issues related to the new sex education curriculum, Education Minister Liz Sandals has already said that’s unlikely to lead to any changes. Nor will the province inform all parents about the contents of the new curriculum, which will be left up to individual schools. Thus it’s hardly surprising the government is again being criticized for not meaningfully consulting parents. This time, opposition is being spearheaded by an organization called Parents As First Educators (PAFE). It has launched a petition objecting to what PAFE President Teresa Pierre calls the “graphic” revision of the sex education curriculum. In fairness, the province hasn’t formally updated this curriculum since 1998, although in the 2010 controversy many teachers said the new content wasn’t much different from what was already being taught in schools. It’s obvious the Wynne Liberals now want to appear to be consulting with parents while limiting the scope of that consultation and placing restrictions on which parents will be consulted. Given that, they should expect a similar controversy to the one in 2010.​

Thats right.

After Christians in Ontario thought they had won the battle and stopped
homosexuals from teaching grade 3 students about anal sex,
the Lesbo Premier has not only revived the program,
but entrenched herself and her party into government for another 5 years.

ISIS is now "The Islamic State"

In the past we had a leisurely attitude toward Islam in the West,
due to our concern with more localized and European wars,
and the relatively peaceful experience we had in our our countries,
even when engaging in war overseas.

At the same time, in the interests of maintaining a peaceful coexistance
as far as was possible with Islamic countries, the West has
largely turned a blind eye toward barbarism and dictatorship,
and even encouraged an illusion of Islam as a peaceful religion,
rather than a paramilitary cult intent on taking over the world.

Just the expression "taking over the world" evokes a cartoon-like
image of a mad-scientist or moronic dictator, unlikely to succeed
because of inherently fatal flaws in his plan and himself.

Its an image the media and liberal ideology has encouraged,
or rather brainwashed us with, constantly seeking "explanations"
for criminal, murderous and genocidal behaviours,
in the form of our misunderstanding, or provocation foreigner Muslim peoples,
as if they would naturally be peace-loving citizens if right-wing
warmongers and Colonial Empire builders would just leave them alone.

The sad truth is that violence and horror, slavery and tribal genocides
have been around long before modern Western democracies and
industrial empires and commonwealths ever existed.

"Religions" and cults have risen and fallen alongside empires and city-states,
in a competative environment of utility and illusion, deception and ignorance,
greed and power-lust. 

Many religions are in fact little more than manufactured lies and rationalizations
for the purpose of securing resources and maintaining control and power.

If it is true that 'legitimate' religions such as Christianity and Buddhism
can be exploited by warlords and dictators, bankers and military-industrial complexes, and vested interests, how much more is it true of "religions" and cults that are actually based on paramilitary ideas of conquest?

It is in this light that the objection by liberals that "Islam is as peaceful and harmless a religion as Christianity" must be critically evaluated.

In fact, "Islam" was never a peaceful and harmless 'religion' but was always
an artificially manufactured paramilitary cult, designed to create and sustain
a dictatorial power-base.   It is incompatible with democracy and every other religion and philosophy that exists today.

We can look at maps of historical expansion of Islam, and current political trends in Islamic states, to get a better idea of what this cult really is:

If Westerners have any familiarity with Islam at all, its usually in the historical context of the ancient Caliphates and early spread of Islamic power, from around 630 to 750 A.D.:

We tend to dismiss the potential territorial expansion of Islam
with the idea that these were the 'early years' of empires,
and all political-religious groups engaged in similar proselytizing.

Nowadays, most 'Islamic' nations are considered peaceful states
cooperating in a global economy, and not interested in expansion per se.
The violent nature of dictatorships operating using repression,
or the global expansionist interests of religious authorities is either
ignored or largely hidden from the Western public. 

So much so that Westerners naively cheered for an "Arabic Spring"
while dozens of regimes in the Middle East underwent violent coups
and internal rebellions, and were shocked that democracies didn't
spontaneously pop up in their place.

In fact Westerners are surprised to hear that Muslims even exist,
in such faraway exotic places as Indonesia and Asia.
How did they even get there?

If instead of being satisfied with trite summaries of Islamic wars
from a thousand years ago, and instead focus on the Expansion of Islam
AFTER 750 A.D., we have a chance of understanding the current crisis.

The following map shows the continued steady expansion of Islam, both
as an imposed religion and an economic paramilitary confederacy of regimes:

 We can see that between 750 A.D. and 1500 A.D.,
there has been no essential change in either the political attitudes,
or the expansionist program within Islam.

 The map below shows even further expansion extending all the way into
the East Indies and Java, where Westerners were less concerned with
spreading democracy and modern education, and more concerned with
simply exploiting resources.

From this next map we can see that Islam continues to exploit weak and
vulnerable areas of the 3rd world for religious and military purposes,
just as the West has done for economic and business purposes.
Its now apparent how Islam managed to reach all the way to the Pacific:

 

It is now left for us to consider the Global Spread of Islam,
through even more subtle techniques, such as mass emmigration
into unsuspecting Western countries, with a conscious eye to
eventual appropriation and dominance, and the elimination of
Western religions and culture and laws, to be replaced with
Islamic Sharia Law and Islamic Rule:

 

In case you think that this is just mere coincidence
simply 'fortunate' but unintentional and friendly 'invasion' of the West,
we can consult the latest manifestation of Islam, known as ISIS or ISIL.

This new evolution of the Islamic State is not a small faction or
mere band of religious extremists unlikely to expand.
Rather, its a growth that is destined to succeed in taking over and galvanizing 
the entire region, because the whole area is already 90% proselytized by
previous Islamic invasions, and the promulgation of a war-lord like,
crusader-mindset energized by religious fanaticism.

Let us have a look at what the very leaders of ISIS are openly planning:

We quote this recent piece of research (with link provided):

Islamic State releases map of 5-year plan to spread from Spain to China

"The Islamic State will not succeed in advancing this far, of course. But they will murder many people as they try.

“The Structure of the Islamic State (ISIS),” by Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, September 8, 2014 (thanks to Victor):

Much has been written and said about the Islamic State in Iraq and Sham (the Levant) — ISIS. Most of the commentators have looked at ISIS as another terrorist organization, an al-Qaeda off-shoot, waging a guerrilla war with cohorts of unorganized thugs. The Afghani-style gear, the pickup trucks, the all black or army fatigue uniforms which most ISIS fighters wear, the unshaven beards, the turbans, hoods and head “bandanas” with Arabic inscriptions have added to the confusion.
In fact, ISIS is much more than a terrorist organization; it is a terrorist state with almost all governing elements. Over the last three years, since the beginning of the civil war in Syria, the Islamic State developed from an extremist fringe and marginal faction participating in the civil war to become the strongest, most ferocious, best funded and best armed militia in the religious and ethnic war that is waged today in Syria and Iraq.
But first, what is the name of this entity and what are the borders of the Islamic State? From the first days of its appearance in Syria in 2011, the organization was known as ISIS. However, since the declaration in Summer 2014 of the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate headed by Ibrahim ‘Awad Ibrahim Al Badri al Samarra’i, alias Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi — now the self-declared “Caliph Ibrahim” — ISIS has been transformed into the “Islamic State” (Al Dawla Al Islamiya ) in order to stress the fact that the Caliphate is not to be limited to Iraq, Syria, Israel (Palestine), Jordan and the Levant, but its ambitions lie well beyond those limited borders.

According to the maps published by the Islamic State, the Islamic State will include Andalus in the West (Spain) and stretch from North Africa — the Maghreb — (and the whole of West Africa including Nigeria) through Libya and Egypt (considered one geographical unit – Ard Al-Kinana), include what is called in Islamic state terminology, Ard el Habasha (from Cameroon in the west, Central Africa, the Victoria lake states, Ethiopia and Somalia), the Hijaz (Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States), Yemen until Khurasan in the east – defined as the Central Asian Muslim Republics beginning with Azerbaijan and including Pakistan and the South west part of China, land of the Muslims of Turkish origin, the Uyghurs. The Islamic State includes also Iran and Turkey (named Anadol) in their entirety and parts of Europe (mainly the Balkans, more or less conforming to the borders of the defunct Ottoman Empire with the Austro-Hungarian territories)…."

 The author doesn't believe ISIS can achieve their 'five year plan',
but at least admits they can achieve quite a lot of warfare and bloodshed trying.

We are not so confident that they will remain a small radical group,
when it is obvious that they are already actually a LARGE economic and
military powerhouse, largely because of Western apathy, incompetance,
and betrayal.